|

Turbine tussle blows on

ONGOING DEBATE: Bald Hills Wind Farm at Tarwin Lower continues to be the subject of contention, as neighbours say it is producing nuisance noise.

A DISPUTE over noise at Bald Hills Wind Farm may return to court or end up in the hands of the Federal Government.
Residents engaged in a dispute with Bald Hills Wind Farm about nuisance noise produced by the turbines at Tarwin Lower will meet with the company in August in a bid to settle the issue.
But they have not ruled out suing the company nor taking their concerns to the Federal Environment Minister Sussan Ley should the discussions not reach a solution.
“I am hopeful but not confident that the dispute will be resolved if the parties negotiate in good faith,” the residents’ lawyer Dominica Tannock said.
Bald Hills Wind Farm declined to comment.
The meeting comes after the former councillors of South Gippsland Shire Council found the wind farm was producing nuisance noise, and ordered the wind farm and the neighbours to resolve the matter.
Council was the responsible authority for determining if nuisance noise existed.
The development comes after a noise report ordered by the neighbours found their complaints were legitimate.
The latest version of the noise impact assessment report by Dr Bob Thorne found background sound levels above 40 dB(A) and increases in background sound levels at residents’ homes, all coinciding with the wind farm.
The report stated neighbours reported the turbines were disturbing their sleep and did not comply with its permit.
“The monitoring program confirms that sound levels were exceeded, and sleep disturbance, intrusive noise and nuisance conditions existed at the homes of the persons involved during this monitoring program: John Zakula, Don Fairbrother, Dorothy Fairbrother, Noel Uren, Don and Sally Jelbart, and the Kilsby residence,” the report stated.

Short URL: http://thestar.com.au/?p=29522

Posted by on Jul 16 2019. Filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Recently Commented

  • wstaton: I guess it means he will not be able to attend any council meetings saving us ratepayers his claims for...
  • rojo: Awesome work Lynette
  • vbresident: I read Ms Page’s offering and nearly choked laughing. We have a property on the second estate in...
  • brad: Hi Robbie. Would you like your comments to run as a letter to the editor too? If so, we just need your full...
  • robbiemc: The local council should not be wasting ratepayers money to build a rail trail. And more to the point there...